Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41720878›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Neonatal brain age estimation from T2-weighted magnetic resonance images using shallow regression analysis.

Seyedeh Masoumeh Taji, Kamran Kazemi, Zahra Qodrati, Negar Noorizadeh, Habibollah Danyali, Ardalan Aarabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Seyedeh Masoumeh TajiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran.
Kamran KazemiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran. kazemi@sutech.ac.ir.
Zahra QodratiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran.
Negar NoorizadehDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Habibollah DanyaliDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran.
Ardalan AarabiLaboratory of Functional Neuroscience and Pathologies (UR UPJV 4559), University Research Center, University Hospital, Amiens, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study develops a method for estimating brain age (postmenstrual age, PMA) in preterm and term neonates using T2-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data and shallow regression analysis. The goal is to provide an accurate biomarker for brain maturation in early life. We used T2-weighted imaging data from 885 neonates from the Developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP). To investigate the effects of linear and nonlinear registration, as well as the impact of template selection on brain age estimation error, we registered the input images using both linear and linear-nonlinear transformations to align the images with three neonatal brain templates from the dHCP: (i) the age-specific template, (ii) the full-term 40-week neonatal brain atlas template, and (iii) an arbitrary template randomly selected from a pool of 17 templates designed for neonates. We then applied principal component analysis (PCA) to reduce the dimensionality of the input feature sets in voxel space. The most relevant components, showing higher correlation with PMA, were identified and used to train and test three commonly used shallow regression models: Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Relevance Vector Regression (RVR) using ten-fold cross-validation. Using an age-specific template with linear-nonlinear registration, GPR and SVR achieved mean absolute errors of 0.438 ± 0.06 weeks and 0.437 ± 0.06 weeks, respectively, outperforming RVR (0.441 ± 0.058 weeks) with 350 principal components and an R² of 0.95. SVR showed instability with more components. Template selection and registration type significantly affect brain age estimation performance in neonates.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingConnectomeFemaleGestational AgeHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMalePrincipal Component AnalysisRegression AnalysisBrain age estimationGaussian process regressionMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Relevance vector regressionStructural imagingSupport vector regression

Identifiers

PMID41720878
PMCPMC13022055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.