ArticleScientific reports2026
Agentic AI-driven autonomous decision support system for smart agriculture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A crop recommendation using improved expert-guided constraint aware differential evolution and CatBoost surrogate learning.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Smart crop recommendation: fusing nutrient and climate data with Krill Herd Optimization and explainable AI.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crop productivity is heavily impacted by inefficient fertilizer usage, improper fertilizer handling, and inappropriately chosen crops. To address these issues, this research work proposes an AI-powered Smart Agriculture Prediction System utilizing intelligent agents for carrying out soil classification, estimating soil parameters, crop suggestion, and fertilizer suggestion. The soil classifier module is trained with 1,563 images of black soils, red soils, clay soils, and alluvial soils using MobileNet-V2, ResNet, and Custom CNN, with Custom CNN resulting in a higher accuracy of 92.88%, which performed better in classifying soils based on textures. A soil parameter estimation agent utilizes regression models for estimating pH and NPK content of soils using images. For crop suggestion, a crop dataset with 2,200 samples with parameters such as N, P, K, T, H, pH, and rainfall is used, in which Random Forest model performed better with an accuracy of 92.4% when compared with CNN and DNN models. For fertilizer suggestion, XGBoost performed better with an accuracy of 94.7% in estimating fertilizers such as Urea, DAP, NPK, Potash, and Compost. Real-time climatic parameters are obtained using API in order to make dynamic updates for climatic parameters. Real-time weather data obtained through APIs enables dynamic updates of climatic parameters, while Explainable AI techniques such as SHAP and LIME enhance model transparency and user trust. Additionally, the system incorporates an interactive agent-based framework that processes user inputs, including location, soil images, and nutrient levels, to generate adaptive outputs such as weather alerts, yield potential, and personalized recommendations. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed system effectively integrates deep learning, ensemble learning, and explainability to deliver a scalable, efficient, and sustainable decision-support solution for precision agriculture, promoting optimized resource utilization and environmental stewardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.