ArticleScientific reports2026
Biologically inspired neuromorphic-XAI synergy for transparent and low-carbon healthcare intelligence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The exponential growth of artificial intelligence in healthcare has created unprecedented computational demands, contributing significantly to carbon emissions while often lacking transparency in critical medical decisions. Existing neuromorphic explainable artificial intelligence (NEXAI) systems used in healthcare applications suffer from three primary limitations: inadequate integration of energy-efficient neuromorphic processing with real-time explainability mechanisms, lack of validated frameworks for sustainable resource management in clinical environments, and absence of comprehensive evaluation methodologies that simultaneously address diagnostic accuracy, interpretability, and environmental impact. We develop the NEXAI-Health framework by processing continuous spike streams, iteratively sampling spike rates in the range [Formula: see text]–520 spikes/s, with cycle-to-cycle variations of [Formula: see text] spikes confirming stable neuromorphic firing behavior. Event-driven thresholds are dynamically tuned to [Formula: see text], and simulation sweeps further validate threshold drift within the narrow interval [Formula: see text]. The integrated explainability module processes gradient-based attributions using sample magnitudes [Formula: see text]–0.94, internally expanding to per-layer saliency scores [Formula: see text] across representative trials. Power-aware profiling confirms that all spiking computations remain within the Intel Loihi energy specification of 23.6 pJ per event, supporting sustainable deployment. Experimental iterations on 109,446 MIT-BIH heartbeat samples yield mean diagnostic accuracy of [Formula: see text] with explainability scores of [Formula: see text], and projected energy-efficiency gains converging to [Formula: see text] over conventional AI baselines. Statistical validation employs 10-fold stratified cross-validation with Bonferroni-corrected paired t-tests ([Formula: see text]), demonstrating significant improvements over conventional approaches (Cohen’s [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). The projected neuromorphic energy consumption remains theoretical, with simulated cycles yielding sample values such as 23.6pJ–28.2pJ per spike under a modeled firing rate of [Formula: see text]–[Formula: see text]. Claims regarding biodegradable substrate integration are likewise conceptual, assuming provisional material constants [Formula: see text]–1.34 for tensile–thermal coupling. Clinical translation further mandates regulatory approval and structured physician training, while algorithmic correctness is supported through iterative validation on the MIT-BIH dataset (109, 446 labeled beats). Ultimately, true clinical viability and hardware-level energy efficiency require evaluation on physical neuromorphic processors under real operational constraints.This study presents a theoretical framework validated through software simulation using publicly available MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database; no physical neuromorphic hardware implementation, clinical trials, or human participants were involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.