ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessing the influence of using nano titanium dioxide on the microstructure behavior and geotechnical properties of clayey soil.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of nano–titanium dioxide (TiO₂) on the engineering behavior of cement-stabilized clay. Nano–TiO₂ was incorporated at contents of 0.2%, 0.5%, and 0.9% by dry soil weight, while cement was added at 2%, 4%, and 8%. A comprehensive experimental program, consisting of Atterberg limits, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), direct shear tests, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was conducted to evaluate the effects of nanoparticle addition on soil plasticity, strength, and microstructure. The Atterberg limits results show that nano–TiO₂ increases both the liquid limit and plastic limit, with a corresponding rise in plasticity index due to enhanced water adsorption and nanoparticle–clay interactions. UCS testing revealed that nano–TiO₂ significantly improved strength for specimens containing 4% and 8% cement, with optimal nanoparticle content varying with cement dosage. While increasing cement content increased stiffness, the addition of nanoparticles at constant cement levels did not meaningfully affect elastic modulus. Direct shear results demonstrated that nano–TiO₂ increased the internal friction angle but had minimal influence on soil cohesion. SEM analysis confirmed microstructural densification of the clay–cement matrix, with nanoparticles filling voids, enhancing particle bonding, and contributing to the observed strength improvements. Overall, the findings indicate that nano–titanium dioxide can effectively enhance the mechanical performance of cemented clay, particularly in terms of strength and frictional resistance, and that these improvements are strongly supported by corresponding microstructural modifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.