ArticleScientific reports2026
Mechanical performance of structural lightweight concrete with metallurgical coal aggregates.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Study on the Coupled Relationship Between Dry Density and Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer EPS Concrete.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many studies have investigated industrial by-products as alternatives to natural aggregates; however, little attention has been given to metallurgical coal (MC). This study evaluates MC as a replacement for coarse aggregate to develop structural lightweight concrete (SLWC), using five mixtures with MC contents of 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% by weight. To this end, an experimental program on testing the microstructural and chemical analysis of MC and the mechanical properties of fresh and hardened concrete was conducted. The results showed that increasing MC reduced mechanical performance; compressive (flexural) strength decreased from 37.6 (5.17) MPa at 0% MC to 20.7 (2.75) MPa at 100% MC. Furthermore, increasing the MC content reduced the elastic modulus per four international codes. On the other hand, the results showed that MC significantly decreased density, achieving up to a 24.3% reduction relative to normal-weight concrete and satisfying lightweight classification. Moreover, concrete mixtures with 25% and 50% MC maintained adequate structural performance when subjected to elevated temperatures. From an economic perspective, 75% MC lightweight concrete was more cost-effective and required 12% less reinforcing steel than normal-weight concrete. These findings indicate that MC can improve natural resource sustainability and offer a cost-effective route for sustainable construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.