SynthesisNature communications2026
Plant traits explain variation in symbiotic nitrogen fixation responses to global nitrogen enrichment: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- It takes a village: how plant-associated bacterial communities socialise to shape plant growth and health.Essays in biochemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anthropogenic nitrogen enrichment is widely expected to suppress symbiotic nitrogen fixation in terrestrial ecosystems. Nevertheless, observed symbiotic nitrogen fixation responses remain incompletely explained by exogenous nitrogen inputs, climate, and edaphic factors. In this meta-analysis, we integrate 908 globally distributed field measurements to identify the key predictors that improve simulation of symbiotic nitrogen fixation responses to nitrogen enrichment. On average, symbiotic nitrogen fixation declines by 33.0% upon nitrogen enrichment, with the reduction being more pronounced in non-croplands than croplands. Models considering only environmental factors overestimate symbiotic nitrogen fixation decline relative to observations. The better performance of plant traits like plant growth and biomass allocation (shoot:root ratio) partially buffer symbiotic nitrogen fixation suppression under nitrogen enrichment. Integrating both environmental factors and plant performance traits improves predictive accuracy of symbiotic nitrogen fixation responses by 42.7% and brings the simulated symbiotic nitrogen fixation reductions into close agreement with observations. The alterations in plant performance traits are thus critical for explaining variability in terrestrial symbiotic nitrogen fixation responses, and incorporating plant trait dynamics in Earth System Models can quantitatively partition the compensatory symbiotic nitrogen fixation supported by nitrogen-fixing plant growth from the direct negative impact of nitrogen inputs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.