ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Contextual Updating in Attentional Orienting Relies on the Right Temporoparietal Junction: Evidence From rTMS.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An event-related potentials account of brain predictive coding.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2026Review
- Contextual Updating in Attentional Orienting Relies on the Right Temporoparietal Junction: Evidence From rTMS.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) has been associated with multiple cognitive functions. Particularly, its involvement in attentional processes has been proposed, representing a key node in shifting and reorienting visuospatial attention toward unexpected stimuli. However, more recent evidence has demonstrated a more postperceptual function, suggesting a crucial engagement of rTPJ in contextual updating mechanisms. Therefore, considering the lack of consensus, the aim of the current study was to elucidate rTPJ contribution to attentional processes by applying repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) throughout the administration of a location-cueing paradigm. Importantly, the latter was built in order to permit the disentangling of two critical attentional mechanisms: visuospatial reorienting and contextual updating. Data were collected from young healthy participants performing a discrimination task in a Posner-like paradigm while online rTMS interfered with rTPJ activity starting from 250 ms after the target onset (three pulses at 20 Hz per trial). Comparing behavioral outcomes of the active rTMS condition with a Sham condition (i.e., no stimulation), allowed us to directly observe rTMS effects on the neural processes at hand. Our findings showed an intact advantage of being attentionally focused on the attended location along with the cost of rearranging attentional resources to the unattended location in both rTMS and Sham condition, thus supporting that rTPJ should not be involved in triggering the reorienting of attention toward unexpected locations. Rather, rTMS selectively affected participants' ability to update the predictive attentional context, letting us conclude that rTPJ could be engaged in postperceptual and contextual updating mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.