ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
Measuring Primary Care Capacity: Unique Patients Seen per Year and Implications for Workforce Shortages.
Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of Advanced Practice Providers in improving primary care capacity: practice perspectives on challenges and opportunities.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Point-of-Care Ultrasound, Prevention and Screening, Family Medicine Workforce, Navigating Systems, and Improving Patient Care.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a growing primary care workforce shortage. Primary care physicians (PCPs) already have a broad scope of work yet face increasing demands on their time and pressure to see more patients. This analysis aims to update PCP workforce shortage estimates by assessing the number of unique patients seen per year by each PCP in Virginia.
methodsFrom Virginia's all-payer claims database (APCD), we identified the unique number of patients seen annually between 2016 to 2021. We evaluated variation by physicians, practices, and communities by using licensure, claims, census, and Virginia Department of Health clinician survey data for PCPs across family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics, and ob-gyn. We conducted iterative bootstrap simulation analyses to estimate the PCP workforce shortage, accounting for panel size and Full-Time Equivalent (FTE).
resultsThere are 4,508 PCPs in Virginia, with 34.2% of PCPs over age 60 compared with 24.0% aged 30 to 49. The median number of unique patients seen by physicians in 2021 was 1,290. On average, physicians had 2,800 total visits annually, and patients were seen 2.12 times per year. PCPs saw more patients if they were aged 40 to 59, worked in health systems, practiced in rural communities, or served communities with lower social needs. Average FTE was 0.847 (SD: 0.215). In 2021, 1,305 additional PCPs were needed for each Virginian to have a PCP, preventing a 28.8% shortfall (95% CI: 27.9%-30.0%). This marks an increase from a 17.7% shortfall in 2016.
conclusionPrimary workforce shortages are more dire than prior estimates when accounting for number of patients seen per year and FTE. The ideal number of patients a PCP can care for should be determined by clinicians and practices, with consideration of patient complexity, physician capacity, and practice resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.