ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics2026
Raman-assessed cutaneous pharmacokinetics of doxepin topical products.
Article in International journal of pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Development of regulatory science tools to facilitate and accelerate accessibility to complex generic drug products continues to be the focus of significant research activity. The application of confocal Raman spectroscopy to the assessment of cutaneous drug pharmacokinetics is a particular example and has been exploited here to compare two approved topical creams (the reference-listed drug product and a generic) of doxepin hydrochloride with an intentionally non-equivalent, laboratory-made solution of the drug. Experiments involved administration of the formulations to pig skin ex vivo for 6 or 12 h (the uptake phase) followed by 2 and 4 h of clearance to generate Raman-assessed absorption-elimination profiles at nominal depths of 5 μm and 25 μm into the skin. This was achieved, despite overlap between spectral features of the drug with those from the skin, using a background signal removal strategy that also allowed the two functional excipients of the laboratory-made solution to be independently tracked. The areas under the Raman signal versus time absorption-elimination profiles showed (as expected) that the two creams were very similar but that the laboratory-made solution was distinctly different. First-order elimination rate constants describing the clearance phase post-application of doxepin from the superficial skin layers into the deeper tissue were also derived from the spectral data. While the experimental design was insufficiently powered to assess bioequivalence, the data background signal separation paradigm notably expands the potential value of the approach to a broader range of chemical species than had been originally envisaged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.