ArticlePoultry science2026
Distinct gut microbiota signatures in white leghorn and silky fowl are associated with divergent laying performance.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cecal microbiota-host phenotype associations in young White Leghorn and Silky Fowl chickens.Poultry science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gut microbiota is a key modulator of nutrient utilization and egg production in laying hens. However, breed-associated differences in gut microbiota during the critical peak laying period, as well as their spatial distribution along the intestinal tract, remain poorly characterized. We compared the microbiota of duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and cecum in high-yielding White Leghorn (WL, n = 20) and niche-adapted Silky Fowl (SF, n = 20) hens at peak lay using 16S rRNA sequencing, with intestinal segments analyzed as within-individual compartments. The small intestinal segments exhibited conserved Lactobacillus dominance in both breeds. In contrast, the cecal microbiota diverged significantly: WL was enriched in Bacteroides (P < 0.05), which was linked to glycan degradation, while SF harbored a higher abundance of Faecalibacterium (P < 0.05), associated with vitamin B12 synthesis. Functional prediction revealed that WL upregulated energy-harvesting pathways such as glycolysis in the small intestines and glycosaminoglycan degradation in the cecum. Conversely, SF prioritized stress-resilience pathways including porphyrin metabolism. These functional profiles aligned with host phenotypes, where Lactobacillus and Bacteroides abundance correlated with hepatic efficiency in WL, and multiple microbiota taxa were associated with maintaining metabolic homeostasis and adaptation in SF. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that breed-specific cecal microbiota and their metabolic functions underlie divergent host resource-allocation strategies during peak lay. These results provide tangible targets for modulating the gut ecosystem through nutritional or breeding strategies, aiming to enhance disease resilience in commercial stocks or improve robustness and productivity in indigenous breeds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.