ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Co-Designed Mental Health Screening App (Here for You) for University Students: Pilot Feasibility Mixed Methods Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- National Task Force on Mental Health and Well-being of Medical students: A critique.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMental health disorders are a growing public health concern among university students globally and in India, exacerbated by stigma and limited access to care. Mobile health (mHealth) apps offer a potential solution, but user engagement and cultural relevance remain key challenges. This pilot study evaluated Here for You, a mental health screening app co-designed with Indian university students to provide accessible, nonstigmatizing support.
objectiveThis mixed methods study aimed to (1) describe the user-centered codevelopment and pilot testing process of the Here for You app; (2) evaluate the app's feasibility, user acceptability, and engagement; and (3) assess the concurrent validity of the app's screening tool, the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) against established clinical measures (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAM-D], Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [HAM-A], and Perceived Stress Scale [PSS]).
methodsThis study used a 4-phase user-centered design involving students with lived mental health experience, clinicians, and developers. A purposive sample of 30 university students (mean age 21, SD 1.8 years; n=15, 50% female) diagnosed with depression, anxiety, or stress participated. Participants completed the DASS-21 via the app and underwent clinical assessments using the HAM-D, HAM-A, and PSS scales. User experience was evaluated using the User Mobile App Rating Scale and qualitative feedback. Data analysis included Pearson correlation coefficients and thematic analysis.
resultsApp-based DASS-21 scores showed strong correlations with clinician-administered scales: HAM-D (r=0.819; P<.001), HAM-A (r=0.887; P<.001), and PSS (r=0.972; P<.001), indicating high concurrent validity. However, wide CIs reflected the small sample size typical of pilot studies. The app received high usability ratings on a 5-point scale (User Mobile App Rating Scale mean score 4.4), exceeding published benchmarks for mental health apps in low-resource settings, particularly for functionality (mean 4.7, SD 0.3) and aesthetics (mean 4.5, SD 0.4). Qualitative feedback highlighted usability and enhanced privacy due to features such as quick exit, cultural resonance, and the desire for integrated support features. The co-design process directly addressed student concerns, implementing features such as simplified language and crisis support links.
conclusionsThis pilot study provides preliminary evidence for the feasibility and user acceptability of the Here for You app, co-designed using a participatory approach with Indian university students. Strong correlations between app-based screening and clinical assessments (r=0.819, r=0.887, and r=0.972) suggest promising concurrent validity. These findings from a single-site pilot study require validation through multisite studies across diverse educational and cultural contexts before broader implementation recommendations. By integrating user experience, clinical rigor, and ethical safeguards, such as adherence to digital personal data protection guidelines, the app offers a culturally resonant and scalable model for digital mental health screening in low-resource settings. This approach underscores the value of the "nothing about us without us" principle in developing effective mHealth interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.