ArticleJournal of participatory medicine2026
Patients and Caregivers Leveraging AI to Improve Their Health Care Journey: Case Study and Lessons Learned.
Article in Journal of participatory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inter-Model Variability of ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude in Treatment Recommendations for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- The Role of Emotions in Health Literacy and Patient Education: Trends, Technologies, and Future Opportunities-A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Conversational Artificial Intelligence as a Source of Oral Health Information: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Romanian Population.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Engaging Arab/MENA Communities in Learning Health Systems: Insights and Guidance for Future Research on AI and Health Equity.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Navigating the artificial intelligence-informed patient: a cross-sectional study of physicians' perceptions and clinical practices.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlabelled: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into everyday life. Yet in health care, patients and families are challenged to understand how AI may be helpful. As a result, real-world patient stories remain scarce. Generative AI can serve as a learning partner to help patients interpret complex medical information, prepare for appointments, and navigate care decisions. A case study is presented from the perspective of a caregiver and a clinician colleague, describing how one family used generative AI (ChatGPT; OpenAI) to better understand test results, possible diagnoses and treatments, prepare for visits, and summarize and share information with an extended care team. This paper also shares tips and lessons learned with others navigating similar health care challenges. A first-hand account of family interactions with ChatGPT is described during a period between diagnostic imaging and surgical consultation. Real-world use of AI by a caregiver is showcased, including strategies used to understand and summarize health record data, querying AI using medical documents, and resulting actions taken by the family. Using the case study as a springboard, the authors provide a separate section to share lessons learned for patients and caregivers in their use of AI. The family reported benefits of AI, including the ability to comprehend health information by translating medical records into patient-friendly language; to emotionally process and prepare for visits; to research diagnoses and treatments; to streamline communication with care teams by using concise patient summaries; and to feel more empowered to take timely, informed action. Generative AI can serve as a valuable companion tool for patients and caregivers navigating complex medical information. By translating results, providing education about diagnoses and treatment options, and helping prepare for visits, AI may reduce care delivery delays and raise family confidence in decision-making. However, limitations exist, and patients and caregivers need to validate AI output to ensure accuracy and privacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.