Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41719488›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2026

Performance of Large Language Models Under Input Variability in Health Care Applications: Dataset Development and Experimental Evaluation.

Saubhagya Joshi, Monjil Mehta, Sarjak Maniar, Mengqian Wang, Vivek Kumar Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saubhagya JoshiLibrary and Information Sciences, School of Communication & Information, Rutgers University, 4 Huntington St, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, United States, +1 (848) 932-7500.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8067-6227
Monjil MehtaRutgers Business School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8053-5983
Sarjak ManiarRutgers Business School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2288-5216
Mengqian WangUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4451-9595
Vivek Kumar SinghLibrary and Information Sciences, School of Communication & Information, Rutgers University, 4 Huntington St, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, United States, +1 (848) 932-7500.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8194-2336

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into health care, where they contribute to patient care, administrative efficiency, and clinical decision-making. Despite their growing role, the ability of LLMs to handle imperfect inputs remains underexplored. These imperfections, which are common in clinical documentation and patient-generated data, may affect model reliability. Objective: This study investigates the impact of input perturbations on LLM performance across three dimensions: (1) overall effectiveness in different health-related applications, (2) comparative effects of different types and levels of perturbations, and (3) differential impact of perturbations on health-related terms versus non-health-related terms. Methods: We systematically evaluate 3 LLMs on 3 health-related tasks using a novel dataset containing 3 types of human-like variations (redaction, homophones, and typographical errors) at different perturbation levels. Results: Contrary to expectations, LLMs demonstrate notable robustness to common variations, and in more than half of the cases (151/270, 55.92%), the performance was stable or improved. In some cases (38/270, 14.07%), variations resulted in an increased performance, especially when dealing with lower perturbation levels. Redactions, often stemming from privacy concerns or cognitive lapses, are more detrimental than other variations. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the need for health care applications powered by LLMs to be designed with input variability in mind. Robustness to noisy or imperfect inputs is essential for maintaining reliability in real-world clinical settings, where data quality can vary widely. By identifying specific vulnerabilities and strengths, this study provides actionable insights for improving model resilience and guiding the development of safer, more effective artificial intelligence tools in health care. The accompanying dataset offers a valuable resource for further research into LLM performance under diverse conditions.

Indexed as

dataseterror analysishealth informaticslarge language modelsrobustness

Identifiers

PMID41719488
PMCPMC12923095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.