Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41719487›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Toward Best Practice Guidelines and Curricula for Virtual Care (Telehealth) in a Cancer Center: Protocol for a Multimethod Study.

Sharon Brownie, Lauren Parkinson-Zarb, Andrew Dimech, Maria Ftanou, Patrick Broman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sharon BrownieSchool of Rural Medicine, Charles Sturt University, Leeds Parade, Orange, NSW, 2800, Australia, 61 0419330822.ORCID 0000-0001-7204-2451
Lauren Parkinson-ZarbDepartment of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6070-4849
Andrew DimechOffice of the Chief Nurse, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-2628-0825
Maria FtanouOffice of the Chief Nurse, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5884-7851
Patrick BromanCentre for Health and Social Practice, Waikato Institute of Technology, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3491-4137

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Virtual health care, originally as telephone-based telehealth, has been used for more than 45 years; however, the literature shows limited understanding of the competencies required for safe virtual care practice in nursing and other health-related fields. This has led to a widening education-practice gap. Objective: The aim of this study is to identify (1) clinical guidelines for nurses and other health professionals undertaking routine virtual health (telehealth) assessment, triage, and follow-up care; and (2) curricula for preparing health professionals for virtual care. Subsequently, data will be collected within a major cancer treatment service to codetermine core competencies and curricula for nurses engaged in telehealth clinics. Methods: This was a phased multimethod study including reviews of existing literature, followed by qualitative (in-depth interviews, n=20) and quantitative (online survey, n=200) data collection and co-design workshops (n=5) to achieve project aims. Implementation will involve a pilot and an evaluation before full rollout of the developed guidelines and syllabus. Results: Literature reviews completed in the initial phase of this project confirm a paucity of existing guidelines for virtual health assessment and an urgent need to develop telehealth or virtual care competency frameworks and curricula for health professionals in training or practice. We propose an approach to develop and test these materials in practice. A total of US $52.6 was provided by a philanthropic alumni for support over the full duration of the project. Recruitment and collection from human participants will commence on February 1, 2026, following procurement of ethics clearance. Phase 2 data collection and analysis will occur from February to December 2026. Results will be presented to the ethics committee and clearance gained to implement and evaluate the program in 2027. Conclusions: Working with health providers, consumers, and academics toward standards of practice and curricula is clearly needed to ensure that the current and future nursing workforce is prepared for the continuing rise in virtual care. Completion of this project will fill an existing gap in the provision of guidelines and education for nurses providing virtual care.

Indexed as

CurriculumPractice Guidelines as TopicTelemedicineCancer Care FacilitiesHumansQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnairesclinical guidelinesnursing educationoncology nursingpractice guidelinestelecaretelehealthvirtual medicine

Identifiers

PMID41719487
PMCPMC12923096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.