Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41719455›Full record

Observational studyBlood advances2026

Anticoagulation, recurrent thrombosis, and major bleeding in antiphospholipid syndrome: UK multicenter observational study.

Christina Crossette-Thambiah, Indika Rajakaruna, Zain Odho, Andrew J Doyle, Karen A Breen, Michael Laffan, Deepa J Arachchillage, HaemSTAR Study Collaborators

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christina Crossette-ThambiahCentre for Haematology, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Indika RajakarunaDepartment of Computer Science and Digital Technologies, University of East London, London, United Kingdom.
Zain OdhoDepartment of Haematology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5176-4364
Andrew J DoyleHaemostasis and Thrombosis Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Karen A BreenHaemostasis and Thrombosis Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Michael LaffanCentre for Haematology, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8268-3268
Deepa J ArachchillageCentre for Haematology, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
HaemSTAR Study Collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractAntiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity with persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Due to the heterogeneity and relative rarity of this disorder, clinical practice in the management of APS remains varied. In this retrospective UK-wide multicenter study, we aimed to delineate clinical practice and outcomes in thrombotic APS to improve the areas of limited knowledge, particularly anticoagulant practice, thrombotic recurrence, and bleeding. Anticoagulation in Antiphospholipid Syndrome is the largest multicenter observational study to date, spanning 20 National Health Service trusts in the UK, and including 500 adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with thrombotic APS, on or off anticoagulation during 2012-2021. Thrombotic APS is primarily treated with vitamin K antagonists; however, the rates of recurrent thrombosis remain high. In the last decade, recurrent thrombosis occurred in 43 of 125 (34.4%), 31 of 95 (32.6%), and 37 of 93 (39.8%) patients with single-, dual-, and triple-positive aPL, respectively, with a recurrence rate of 46%. There was no difference in the probability of recurrent thrombosis based on the number of positive aPL tests (P = .82), especially in the first 3 years. However, the probability of recurrent thrombosis was significantly higher in patients with lupus anticoagulant (P< .01) compared with the presence of other antibodies. There was a higher probability of recurrence in patients with arterial than venous thrombosis (P = .03). Overall, the 10-year bleeding rate was 22.0%, with 6.7% of patients having major bleeding. Identifying patients with APS at higher risk of recurrent thrombosis remains a challenge, and current risk stratification is not adequate.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsAntiphospholipid SyndromeHemorrhageThrombosisAdultAntibodies, AntiphospholipidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomAntibodies, AntiphospholipidAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID41719455
PMCPMC13158745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.