Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Haiyan ChuDepartment of Environmental Genomics, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety and Emergency Prevention and Control Technology of Higher Education Institutions in Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6110-6381
Huilin ZhangDepartment of Environmental Genomics, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety and Emergency Prevention and Control Technology of Higher Education Institutions in Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0009-0008-2110-5158
Dahua RenDepartment of Environmental Genomics, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety and Emergency Prevention and Control Technology of Higher Education Institutions in Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Xuanying JiangDepartment of Environmental Genomics, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety and Emergency Prevention and Control Technology of Higher Education Institutions in Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yang YuDepartment of Nutrition and Food Safety, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0009-0009-5796-7910
Jialei ZhuDepartment of Environmental Genomics, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety and Emergency Prevention and Control Technology of Higher Education Institutions in Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0009-0000-5548-1508
Kexin LiDepartment of Environmental Genomics, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety and Emergency Prevention and Control Technology of Higher Education Institutions in Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0009-0007-7963-504X
Haiping LiuDepartment of Environmental Genomics, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety and Emergency Prevention and Control Technology of Higher Education Institutions in Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Linfan XuDepartment of Environmental Genomics, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety and Emergency Prevention and Control Technology of Higher Education Institutions in Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0009-0003-2337-1613
Xiaoting LiDepartment of Nutrition and Food Safety, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3878-6120
Zhen DingDepartment of Environmental Genomics, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety and Emergency Prevention and Control Technology of Higher Education Institutions in Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8879-5685
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
With increasing understanding of cadmium (Cd) exposure levels and toxicity mechanisms, the adequacy of current Cd limit standards for protecting public health requires comprehensive evaluation. Here, we found that 39.04% of rice Cd content surpassed the fifth percentile of benchmark dose lower limit (BMDL
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Assessing the health risks of rice cadmium content standards in China. · full record | OpenQuestion