ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Intercellular forces driving stratification in a two-layer corneal epithelium: Insight from a Voronoi cell-based simulation model.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cornea is a self-renewing, multilayered tissue maintained with remarkable precision. Its outermost layer, the corneal epithelium, consists of five to seven stratified cell layers, sustained by two coordinated processes: the centripetal migration of transit amplifying cells (TACs) from peripheral limbal epithelial stem cells (LESCs), and delamination (vertical movement) of cells between layers. Despite this well-organized renewal, the mechanisms governing epithelial stratification remain largely unknown. In this study, we present a two-dimensional Voronoi cell-based model that captures the dynamics of epithelial stratification. Our model incorporates two distinct epithelial layers-the basal and the suprabasal layers-and accounts for key cellular processes. These processes are mediated by mechanical interactions such as cell-substrate adhesion, as well as horizontal and vertical intercellular forces. Our simulations show that cell delamination, which drives stratification, is strongly linked to TAC proliferation. In contrast, LESC division remains largely unchanged, suggesting that TACs buffer LESC activity, consistent with the slow-cycling nature of stem cells. This reveals that processes weakening the cell-to-substrate interaction will enhance the turnover of epithelial cells without the need for external growth factor induction, which is a notable finding. Interestingly, while increased shedding promotes division and delamination, excessive shedding leads to mechanical compensation through cell stretching in the upper layers. This mechanical response provides a simple, plausible explanation for the presence of enlarged cells in the superficial epithelial layers, while not excluding the potential contributions of other mechanisms. Our model reveals a direct link between the shedding rate and the centripetal velocity of clonal growth, predicting that increased surface cell loss accelerates cell movement-a response similar to wound healing, where cells rapidly migrate to restore the damaged area. These results highlight how cell size, migration, and turnover are tightly coupled, and offer deeper insights into how physical forces work together to maintain and rapidly restore epithelial integrity. Although the real cornea contains five to seven layers, this two-layer framework focuses on the key mechanical principles of stratification and can be viewed as a foundational step toward more comprehensive multilayer modelling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.