Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41719371›Full record

ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2026

Comparing image quality of synchrotron and laboratory nano-CT scans: a round robin study.

Simon Wittl, Simon Zabler, Jonas Fell, Julie Villanova, Pierre Lhuissier, Stefanie Hildebrandt, Hans Georg Herrmann

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simon WittlTechnology Campus Plattling, Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-0365-7018
Simon ZablerTechnology Campus Plattling, Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1632-6673
Jonas FellCore Facility for Correlative Microscopy and Tomography CoMiTo, Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Saarland, Germany.
Julie VillanovaID16B, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6157-2289
Pierre LhuissierSIMaP, Universite Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Stefanie HildebrandtMaterials Synthesis and Development, Fraunhofer Institute for Ceramic Technologies and Systems IKTS, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9163-6148
Hans Georg HerrmannCore Facility for Correlative Microscopy and Tomography CoMiTo, Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Saarland, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive comparison of image quality between synchrotron-based and laboratory-based nano-computed tomography (nano-CT) systems, using a standardized 3D test phantom composed of monodisperse silica spheres. A round-robin approach was employed across multiple international facilities to benchmark performance across various imaging modalities and setups, including absorption and phase contrast techniques. Image quality was quantitatively assessed using three-dimensional signal-to-noise ratio (SNR

Indexed as

modulation transfer functionnano-CTsynchrotron radiation

Identifiers

PMID41719371
PMCPMC12948024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.