ArticlePloS one2026
Sustaining grant-funded programs: Conditions for sustaining initiatives that enhance diversity in STEMM.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Institutionalizing grant-funded interventions: a multiple case study examining long-term investments in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM).International journal of STEM education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As funding agencies seek to broaden their impact in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) and workforce diversity, many grants have required plans for sustaining institutional change beyond the grant-period. However, little is known about the types of STEMM interventions that are likely to be sustained. Employing a multiple case study design, we examine the NIH BUilding Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) initiative, at 10 awarded higher education sites nationwide, designed to promote sustainable change in biomedical workforce diversity. Among all the activities developed by program sites, undergraduate research training, faculty mentoring training, and curricular changes were most likely to be sustained in the final two years of the 10-year award period. Drawing on implementation science, we also examined why interventions were sustainable and identified four contextual elements that largely facilitated program sustainability: institutional financial status; organizational infrastructure and partnerships; central administration and STEMM faculty commitment; and alignment with institutional priorities. Ultimately, this study provides key lessons for future grant-funded teams and senior administrators engaged in efforts to promote equity and inclusion in STEMM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.