Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41719368›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Scarcity mindset's positive association with using alternative financial services.

George Rooney, Cäzilia Loibl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

George RooneyDepartment of Human Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5300-6922
Cäzilia LoiblDepartment of Human Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7586-3295

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scarcity mindset, where people do not have what they feel that they need, can help consumers address the area of scarcity, but on the other hand can lead to neglect and mistakes elsewhere. This study tests whether a scarcity mindset is associated with the use of alternative financial services, whether the association is stable above and beyond established predictors of the use of alternative financial services, and whether it differs by household income. Data come from the 2021 FINRA National Financial Capability Study's State-by-State survey wave, N = 24,349. Results of binary logistic regression analyses show that, controlling for established predictors of alternative financial services use and socio-demographic characteristics, a stronger scarcity mindset is significantly positively related to alternative financial services use. These findings hold for the pre-COVID-19 2018 data with regard to income groups, and although high-income respondent are lesser users of alternative financial services, the scarcity mindset transcends income status and emerges as a significant predictor of alternative financial services use for study participants regardless of household income. Study implications point to the need to assess the role of the scarcity mindset for newer alternative financial services products, including fintech applications. (192/300).

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansIncomeSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41719368
PMCPMC12923054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.