ArticlePLOS digital health2026
AID-FGS: Artificial intelligence-enabled diagnosis of female genital schistosomiasis: Preliminary findings.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Female genital schistosomiasis (FGS) is a sequela of infection with a waterborne parasite prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa and is associated with increased HIV risk. Diagnosis of FGS involves visual colposcopic identification of lesions on the cervix or vaginal walls. Previous studies have utilized digital image processing methods with statistical validation, and more recently, an artificial intelligence (AI)-based approach has also been explored. In this work, we sought to evaluate the performance of an AI model for identifying the presence of FGS from cervical photographs. Colposcopy images were obtained from 340 subjects in Zambia. Ground truth for presence or absence of FGS was determined by trained expert human examiners using visual assessment of images. Examiners also provided a FGS severity score between 0-8 for each image based on the number of lesions and the cervical quadrants affected, where 8 denotes highest severity and 0 denotes no FGS. The images were pre-processed with specular reflection artifact removal and image cropping to focus on the regions corresponding to the cervix and the transformation zone. The preprocessed dataset was randomly divided into training (FGS = 71, no FGS = 71) and testing (FGS = 21, no FGS = 177) cohorts. Image representations in the latent space were obtained using an ensemble of pre-trained machine learning models to further classify the image into FGS and no FGS. The best performance in the testing dataset was obtained at subject-level with area under the curve (AUC) =0.70 (95% Confidence interval: 0.58 - 0.82), Specificity = 0.68, and Sensitivity = 0.71, against the ground truth. Subjects with higher FGS severity scores (between 5-8) had high prediction rate by the machine classifier compared to those with lower severity scores (between 1-4). Machine learning shows promise in detecting FGS from limited colposcopy images. Early, accurate diagnosis may enhance reproductive health, and reduce HIV transmission risks, safeguarding maternal and child health.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.