Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41719358›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Degradation graphs reveal hidden proteolytic activity in peptidomes.

Erik Hartman, Johan Malmström, Jonas Wallin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erik HartmanDivision of Infection Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9997-2405
Johan MalmströmDivision of Infection Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jonas WallinDepartment of Statistics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein degradation is a regulated process that reshapes the proteome and generates bioactive peptides. Peptidomics and degradomics enables large-scale measurement of these peptides, yet most data analyses approaches treat peptides as isolated endpoints rather than intermediates produced by sequential cleavage. Here, we introduce degradation graphs, a probabilistic framework that represents proteolysis as a directed acyclic network of cleavage events with explicit absorption. From single-snapshot peptidomes, we infer graph weights by gradient descent or linear-flow optimization, quantify flows through branches and bottlenecks, and correct a core bias in conventional quantification. Across three biological datasets, failure to model downstream trimming leads to 3-4-fold underestimation of upstream proteolytic activity. Moreover, degradation graphs provide graph-structured features that enable machine learning models to capture protease-specific signatures from both graph topology and sequence context. Taken together, these findings establish explicit degradation modeling as a practical approach to mechanistic and interpretable peptidomics, bridging the fields of degradomics and peptidomics.

Indexed as

PeptidesProteolysisProteomeProteomicsComputational BiologyHumansMachine LearningPeptide HydrolasesPeptide HydrolasesPeptidesProteome

Identifiers

PMID41719358
PMCPMC12923037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.