ArticlePloS one2026
A scoping review and thematic analysis of the landscape of spiritual health and spirituality in Canada.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "So Much Comes Up": Emotion Regulation in Psychotherapy Addressing Existential, Spiritual and Religious Themes.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Correction: A scoping review and thematic analysis of the landscape of spiritual health and spirituality in Canada.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Literature that focuses explicitly on spiritual health as a dimension of health remains comparatively underdeveloped in many national contexts, including Canada. Recent reviews published in 2007 and 2022 identify several persistent gaps in this area, particularly in how spiritual health is theorized, operationalized, and situated within broader frameworks of health. While the literature on spirituality and health is more substantial and has largely approached spirituality as a determinant or influencing factor shaping health outcomes, it nonetheless reveals conceptual and empirical limitations that call for further refinement. Taken together, these bodies of work point to the need for deeper and more sustained scholarly attention and greater conceptual clarity, particularly within Canada's distinct spiritual and sociocultural landscape. For instance, Indigenous spiritualities in Canada, often rooted in Traditional Knowledge systems, intersect with broader discussions of spirituality and health. Furthermore, given Canada's multicultural context, the convergence of religion with spirituality is also worth exploring. Covering over 30 years of research, this scoping review is arguably the first project of its kind to understand the landscape of both spiritual health and spirituality (in relation to health) in Canada. From an initial 4,977 articles collated, 187 articles met the inclusion criteria and were clustered around fifty primary health-related contexts. Collectively, our findings highlight where future research on this topic may be directed. This review also shares key thematic trends, namely the nuanced convergence of spirituality with religion concerning health; the other dimensions of health that spirituality is connected to or discussed with; the presence/role of interfaith dialogue; and the cultural considerations concerning spirituality and health. Overall, by moving beyond the descriptive content of our articles and mapping out the discursive content of the articles as well, this review not only fills critical gaps in Canada's landscape of spiritual health, but also critically shows that Canada's spiritual milieu is "thick" and "textured." It is this nuance and complexity that we aim to elucidate in this scoping review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.