Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Yinliang Wang *State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0009-0004-5161-3613
Kun Feng *State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Haoqin Ke *Agriculture Gene Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China.ORCID 0009-0006-6327-7711
Huanhuan DongState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Kebin LiState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Bingzhong RenAgriculture Gene Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China.
Chen LuoCollege of Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Cheng QuInstitute of Plant Protection, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.
Ran WangInstitute of Plant Protection, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.
Jiao YinState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Walter S LealDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.ORCID 0000-0002-6800-1240
Funding
National Key R&D Program of China 2023YFE0113600National Key R&D Program of China 2023YFE0125800
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Using gas chromatography-electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and chiral capillary GC with synthetic stereoisomers, followed by laboratory and field validation, we identified the sex pheromone of the copper green chafer (
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Pheromone receptors for japonilure in · full record | OpenQuestion