ArticlePloS one2026
Boundary-aware dual-discriminator generative adversarial network for data augmentation in financial transaction fraud detection.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid growth of digital payments exacerbates the challenges in Financial Transaction Fraud Detection (FTFD). These challenges stem primarily from an extreme class imbalance, where legitimate transactions greatly outnumber fraudulent ones. This imbalance significantly hampers the ability of FTFD models to accurately learn fraud patterns. Although existing data augmentation techniques have shown effectiveness in alleviating this problem, they are often negatively influenced by anomalous samples that diverge from the true fraud distribution due to fraudsters' concealment strategies and the inherent complexity of fraudulent patterns. This divergence makes it challenging to accurately model the distribution of fraudulent activities. In this work, we propose a Boundary-Aware Dual-discriminator Generative Adversarial Network (BADGAN) to address the class imbalance issue in FTFD. BADGAN integrates a boundary sample classifier with a dual-constraint mechanism based on distance adversarial learning, allowing the generator to produce synthetic samples that both adhere to the distribution of real fraud data and maintain a distance from the decision boundary. This boundary-aware design emphasizes the optimization of sample quality near classification boundaries, thereby improving the downstream classifier's ability to distinguish fraudulent behavior. Extensive experiments on both real-world and public datasets demonstrate that BADGAN outperforms its competitive peers in addressing the class imbalance issue, thereby enhancing the detection performance of FTFD models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.