ArticlePLOS mental health2026
Brief psychological intervention for the prevention of deliberate self-poisoning: A randomized controlled trial from Sri Lanka.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous work suggests that many nurses in Sri Lanka, particularly those who work in primary care, involved in the medical treatment of persons who attempt self-poisoning already approach their role holistically and consider 'providing mental health support as a part of nursing. However, at present, nurses are not given formal training on the delivery of such support, nor has the efficacy or feasibility of such an intervention been assessed in Sri Lanka. A mixed-method design was employed: a pilot randomized controlled trial with embedded qualitative methods. Participants (n = 300) were admitted to Teaching Hospital Peradeniya after non-fatal self-poisoning incidents. The brief psychological intervention consisted of a counselling session that encouraged participants to explore alternative strategies for managing emotional distress and future stressors. Ward nurses received training to deliver the intervention to assigned patients. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected at baseline and follow-up. At the six-month follow-up, the trail demonstrated the intervention's effectiveness in significantly reducing anxiety and promoting positive coping strategies, although no significant differences were observed in depression rates or alcohol use disorder. Qualitative interviews indicated that participants, found the counselling valuable for emotional support and guidance in managing future interpersonal conflicts and stressors. Overall, this study suggests that brief psychological interventions can support the mental health of those at risk of self-poisoning and encouraging alternative coping strategies. When offering mental health support to individuals who have attempted self-poisoning, it is more feasible to assign dedicated, trained nurses than to expect all nurses to contribute.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.