ArticlePloS one2026
Prediction of COVID-19 hospitalisation, ICU admission or death following ChAdOx1 vaccination using artificial intelligence: A clinical predictive model from the English RAVEN study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study identifies predictors of severe COVID-19 following completion of two-dose primary series of the AZD1222 COVID-19 vaccine, employing eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Shapely additive explanations (SHAP), as an explainable artificial intelligence (AI) approach.
methodA retrospective cohort study using linked primary care data from the Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners Clinical Informatics Digital Hub (ORCHID), including computerised medical records of over 19 million people in England, for the period from 8th December 2020-31st December 2021, as part of the Real-world effectiveness of the AZD1222 COVID-19 vaccine in England (RAVEN) study. We evaluated a two-dose primary series of the AZD1222 vaccine on COVID-19 related hospitalisation, ICU admission or death.
resultsA total of 4,515,280 individuals with a two-dose primary series of AZD1222 vaccine were analysed, where 7,171 individuals had a record of severe COVID-19. Variables with the greatest predictive weight for COVID-19 mortality in vaccinated individuals were age ≥ 85 years, high Cambridge Multi-Morbidity Score, and chronic heart, respiratory and kidney diseases; variables predicting COVID-19 hospitalisation following completed primary series included high CMMS, obesity, and being offered early COVID-19 vaccination in the national vaccine campaign (e.g., vaccinated during the first quarter of 2021); predictors of COVID-19 ICU admission included obesity, female sex, being offered early COVID-19 vaccination in the national vaccine campaign, chronic kidney disease and diabetes. Across models, age ≥ 85 years was highly predictive of mortality and moderately predictive of hospitalisation. However, for ICU admission it was reported as not predictive.
conclusionObesity, chronic heart, respiratory and kidney diseases were the main predictors across models, which is comparable to the scientific literature, validating the explainable AI approach. XGBoost can accurately predict severe outcomes in fully vaccinated individuals. Predictive models built on real-world primary care data can help to timely identify individuals to be prioritised for vaccination booster.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.