ArticlePloS one2026
Trends and associations of pulmonary nodule detection rates in China, 2019-2023: A multicenter cross-sectional study based on Real-World Data.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chest CT-detected pulmonary nodules across the COVID-19 pandemic in Guangzhou, China: a regression discontinuity-in-time study, 2013-2023.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- COVID-19 Vaccination and Pulmonary Nodules: A Narrative Review of Causality, Detection Bias and Thoracic Imaging Pitfalls.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Clinical symptoms and prognosis of patients with pulmonary nodules: a real-world cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pulmonary sequelae have garnered public concern. We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional study in outpatient and health exam populations from 23 clinical centers (including university-affiliated/provincial general hospitals, municipal general hospitals, county hospitals, and specialized hospitals) in China (2019-2023), to assess temporal trends and potential influencing factors in the detection of CT-diagnosed pulmonary nodules, pleural effusion, pneumonia, and suspected lung tumors, cancer and viral pneumonia, clarifying pandemic impacts on lung health. Dynamic comparisons across key phases including initial outbreak, vaccine rollout, population-wide vaccination, and major adjustment of pandemic control policies, were performed. This study analyzed 1,616,750 clinical samples (1,102,605 outpatient, 514,145 health examination; 885,945 males, 730,805 females). Pulmonary nodule detection rose progressively, with surges in 2020-2021 and 2023, plateauing in 2021-2022. Outpatients and males showed steeper increases. University-affiliated/provincial hospitals had sharpest increases vs. municipal and county tiers. Specialized hospitals matched general hospital rates. AI boosted detection rates. CT-suspected lung tumors/cancer remained low and stable, unrelated to nodule trends. These results underscore 2019-2023 pulmonary nodule detection surges linked to SARS-CoV-2 infections and AI adoption. COVID-19 vaccination did not accelerate detection but may have slowed it short-term. Long-term studies on infection, vaccine impacts and pandemic-detected nodules' outcomes are urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.