ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Global Surgery as an emerging discipline: Why it thrives despite barriers-And what must happen next.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global Surgery aspires to eliminate inequities in surgical care worldwide, yet it remains a field defined by paradox. This essay critically examines its conceptual, structural, and ethical flaws and why, despite the challenges, Global Surgery continues to flourish. Ten key challenges are explored, including the absence of clear definitions, a persistent awareness-action gap, unrecognized leadership from the Global South, voluntarism without remuneration, and entrenched Global North dominance in agenda-setting and authorship. These weaknesses undermine credibility, fragment initiatives, and risk perpetuating colonial legacies. Yet the field thrives-driven by idealism, moral duty, emotional rewards, interdisciplinary engagement, and growing institutional recognition. It provides fertile ground for frugal innovation, fosters vibrant peer networks, and carries a powerful moral and historical imperative. For Global Surgery to mature into a true discipline, contradictions must be reconciled through sharper definitions, equitable leadership, South-South collaboration, sustainable financing, ethical authorship, and accountability. Partnerships must move beyond symbolism toward long-term capacity building with local ownership at their core. To translate these priorities into action, this essay critically appraises the strengths and weaknesses of the emerging discipline and provides opportunities to strengthen the new discipline. To do so, it introduces PRISM framework that structures recommendations by: Proposal, Relevance to Global Surgery, Implementation roadmap, Societal benefit, and Measurable indicators. Ultimately, Global Surgery must evolve from a movement into a cohesive, inclusive, and accountable discipline-one that delivers on its promise of safe, timely, and equitable surgical care for all. Until then, it will embody both hope and hard truths, reflecting the tension between aspiration and reality while offering a unique opportunity to reshape the future of global health.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.