Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41719221›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Biomechanical and physiological effects of a passive upper-body exoskeleton during stair ascent and descent.

Gabriela Garcia, Milena Espoz, Camilo Albuja, Rafaella Yañez, Paul G Arauz, Bernard J Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabriela GarciaDepartmento de Ingeniería Industrial, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5666-2156
Milena EspozDepartmento de Ingeniería Industrial, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador.
Camilo AlbujaDepartmento de Ingeniería Industrial, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador.
Rafaella YañezDepartmento de Ingeniería Industrial, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador.
Paul G ArauzDepartment of Orthopaedics, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8724-7035
Bernard J MartinDepartment of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The market has seen the emergence of various passive exoskeletons designed to assist with carrying tasks; however, evidence of their effects during stair negotiation remains limited. In this study fifteen female and fifteen male participants carried a 12-kg load with and without an upper-body passive exoskeleton (CarrySuitⓇ) while ascending and descending stairs. The impact of the CarrySuitⓇ was evaluated through measurements of heart rate, muscle activity, and joint range of motion during both stair ascent and descent. The results indicated that heart rate and muscle activity in the biceps brachii and erector spinae were reduced during both ascent and descent when wearing the exoskeleton, except in females during descent, where muscle activity remained comparable between conditions. An increase in upper-leg muscle activity was observed only in males during ascent, while lower-leg muscle activity was reduced during descent for all participants. Some side-based asymmetries in lower-limb activation were observed, but they were generally modest when using the exoskeleton. Use of the CarrySuitⓇ was associated with reduced joint range of motion, particularly in males, affecting the shoulders, elbows, pelvis, hips, and thorax. In females, reductions in range of motion were limited to the neck and thorax. In contrast, increases in range of motion were observed in the ankles, knees, hips, and shoulders in females, and in the ankles and knees in males. Lower perceived discomfort was reported by all participants when using the exoskeleton, with broader relief observed among male users. These findings suggest that the CarrySuitⓇ has a positive impact on physiological, biomechanical, and perceptual outcomes during stair-based load carrying, and may serve as a viable ergonomic solution for work environments where mechanical aids are impractical.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceStair ClimbingAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalRange of Motion, ArticularYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41719221
PMCPMC12922981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.