ArticlePloS one2026
Biomechanical and physiological effects of a passive upper-body exoskeleton during stair ascent and descent.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The market has seen the emergence of various passive exoskeletons designed to assist with carrying tasks; however, evidence of their effects during stair negotiation remains limited. In this study fifteen female and fifteen male participants carried a 12-kg load with and without an upper-body passive exoskeleton (CarrySuitⓇ) while ascending and descending stairs. The impact of the CarrySuitⓇ was evaluated through measurements of heart rate, muscle activity, and joint range of motion during both stair ascent and descent. The results indicated that heart rate and muscle activity in the biceps brachii and erector spinae were reduced during both ascent and descent when wearing the exoskeleton, except in females during descent, where muscle activity remained comparable between conditions. An increase in upper-leg muscle activity was observed only in males during ascent, while lower-leg muscle activity was reduced during descent for all participants. Some side-based asymmetries in lower-limb activation were observed, but they were generally modest when using the exoskeleton. Use of the CarrySuitⓇ was associated with reduced joint range of motion, particularly in males, affecting the shoulders, elbows, pelvis, hips, and thorax. In females, reductions in range of motion were limited to the neck and thorax. In contrast, increases in range of motion were observed in the ankles, knees, hips, and shoulders in females, and in the ankles and knees in males. Lower perceived discomfort was reported by all participants when using the exoskeleton, with broader relief observed among male users. These findings suggest that the CarrySuitⓇ has a positive impact on physiological, biomechanical, and perceptual outcomes during stair-based load carrying, and may serve as a viable ergonomic solution for work environments where mechanical aids are impractical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.