ReviewJournal of analytical toxicology2026
Unlocking the potential of bone marrow in postmortem forensic toxicology: current evidence and future perspectives.
Review in Journal of analytical toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone marrow (BM) has emerged as a valuable alternative matrix in postmortem toxicology, when conventional samples such as blood or soft tissues are unavailable, degraded or contaminated. BM, due to its protecting anatomical site within the medullary cavity, slows down decomposition, limits environmental and microbial interference and enables the preservation of xenobiotics over extended postmortem intervals. This review summarizes the updated literature on BM anatomy, sampling site, xenobiotic distribution and stability, as well as the influence of postmortem redistribution (PMR) and putrefaction for toxicological interpretation of the analytical results. Evidence indicates that drug distribution in BM is governed by tissue vascularity and analyte physicochemical properties, with lipophilic compounds often reaching higher concentrations in BM than in blood. Numerous studies demonstrate the long-term stability of drugs such as amphetamines, benzodiazepines, sedative-hypnotics and ethanol in BM, even in severely decomposed, burned, or skeletonized remains. While BM shows reduced susceptibility to PMR and putrefaction compared to blood and soft tissues, post-collection stability depends on proper storage conditions. Findings from human forensic cases assess the detectability of a wide range of illicit and therapeutic substances in BM, supporting its utility in reconstructing ante-mortem drug exposure when traditional matrices are compromised. Despite promising results, data remain limited, and further research is needed to refine interpretative frameworks and establish standardized protocols for BM sampling, analysis, and toxicological evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.