Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41719115›Full record

SynthesisTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Value of Machine Learning Models for Cell-Free DNA-Based Multi-Cancer Early Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Qiong Li, Hongde Liu, Jinke Wang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qiong LiState Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0009-0001-3420-762X
Hongde LiuState Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Jinke WangState Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3352-4690

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionMachine learning (ML)-based analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has emerged as a promising strategy for multi-cancer early detection (MCED). However, reported diagnostic performance varies widely across studies, and many estimates are derived from training or enriched cohorts, limiting their relevance to independent validation and real-world settings.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of ML-based cfDNA assays for MCED. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to February 2, 2025. Only independent validation or testing datasets were included; all training datasets were excluded. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were estimated using a bivariate random-effects model. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity.ResultsThirteen studies comprising 23 independent datasets and 14,892 participants were included. The pooled sensitivity was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.66-0.87), and the pooled specificity was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.90-0.98). The summary area under the curve (AUC) was 0.94, with a DOR of 76.6. Substantial between-study heterogeneity was observed (

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsEarly Detection of CancerMachine LearningNeoplasmsHumansPredictive Learning ModelsROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic Acidscell-free DNAearly diagnosisliquid biopsymachine learningmeta-analysismethylation biomarkersmulti-cancer detectionnon-invasive screening

Identifiers

PMID41719115
PMCPMC12925023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.