Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41719093›Full record

ArticleWomen's health (London, England)

The use of robotics in gynecology and reproductive medicine.

Panagiotis Peitsidis, Christos Iavazzo

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Panagiotis PeitsidisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology "Helena Venizelou" Hospital, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9772-4133
Christos IavazzoGynaecological Oncology Department, "Metaxa" Cancer Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last several years, there has been a significant development in the utilization of robotics in gynecology and reproductive medicine. Robotic surgery offers several technical advantages over conventional laparoscopy, including stable and highly magnified 3D vision, enhanced hand-eye coordination, a surgeon-controlled field, optimized ergonomics, motion scaling, and physiological tremor filtering. Women's Health has solicited and published articles as part of a special collection aiming to focus on the current progress of robotics in gynecology and reproductive medicine. In this interesting and innovative issue, three articles were published: one editorial and two retrospective studies.

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresGynecologyReproductive MedicineRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansLaparoscopycomplicationsfertilityhysterectomyreproductionrobotic-assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID41719093
PMCPMC12924972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.