ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2026
How am I doing? It varies: mixed-effects location scale modeling to examine intra-individual variability in health-related research.
Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Data analysis for behavioral medicine: an introduction to the special issue.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intra-individual variability in many behavioral and medical constructs, including pain, sleep, cognitive performance, and emotion is of growing interest. However, intraindividual variability is often quantified using the intra-individual standard deviation (iSD), or related measures like variance or the coefficient of variability, all of which are statistically inefficient and unreliable when calculated on relatively few observations. One underused methodological tool for modeling variance is mixed-effects location scale (MELS) modeling. Unlike typical multi-level models, MELS allows for random effects on variance components, alongside random slopes and intercepts, which provides the ability to ask questions about inter-individual differences in intra-individual variability. The present tutorial will introduce the MELS model with an application to data on chronic pain symptoms over time. In this tutorial, we teach the MELS model and demonstrate software through a series of three increasingly sophisticated applications of MELS modeling to pain data. We will begin with a basic MELS model that only estimates variances and unique intercepts for individuals; this will give an opportunity to describe the MELS model, including how the inter- and intra-individual variance components are related to those in multilevel modeling. Next, we will discuss including random slopes, as we anticipate many researchers may need to detrend their data. Finally, we will discuss a MELS model with predictor(s) to account for differences in inter- and intra-individual variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.