ArticleJournal of community health2026
Development of an Advance Care Planning Pilot Module for New York City Community Members.
Article in Journal of community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advance care planning (ACP) facilitates discussions about future healthcare decisions to ensure alignment with individuals' values, goals, and medical preferences. Despite its benefits, ACP engagement and completion of advance directives (AD) remain limited due to low awareness, misconceptions, and structural barriers. The Tisch Cancer Institute Community Outreach and Engagement Department at Mount Sinai in New York City (NYC) identified this knowledge gap as a key community need. In response, a community-based educational module was created to enhance ACP and AD knowledge. Curriculum development was informed by a literature review and collaboration with health educators, social workers, and palliative care specialists. The intervention included a 30-minute slideshow, a two-page glossary and resource handout, and a healthcare proxy AD form. Workshop impact, acceptability, and feedback were assessed using a validated survey with eight Likert-scale items and two open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics summarized quantitative responses, and thematic analysis was applied to open-ended feedback. Community adult members across NYC participated in eleven workshops held at diverse community sites from June 2024 to June 2025, engaging 141 individuals with a feedback survey response rate of approximately 40% (N = 56). Findings demonstrated acceptability and feasibility. Participants reported increased understanding of ACP concepts and improved confidence in completing ADs. Qualitative comments emphasized clarity, relevance, and practicality of materials. Our community-based educational workshops effectively enhanced ACP knowledge and empowered participants in healthcare decision-making. Future directions include expanding workshop reach, translating materials, and conducting longitudinal follow-up to evaluate sustained engagement and impact on AD completion rates over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41718963What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.