Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41718946›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2026

Bariatric Surgery without Regret: A Prospective Analysis of Patient Satisfaction, Weight Loss, and Quality of Life Outcomes.

Katarzyna Bartosiak, Katarzyna Komorowska, Marcin Zawadzki, Katarzyna Urbańska, Patryk Jesiołowski, Andrzej Kwiatkowski, Maciej Walędziak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katarzyna BartosiakDepartment of General Surgery, Oncology, Metabolic and Thoracic Surgery, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland. bartosiak_k@wp.pl.
Katarzyna KomorowskaDepartment of General Surgery, Oncology, Metabolic and Thoracic Surgery, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Marcin ZawadzkiDepartment of General Surgery, Oncology, Metabolic and Thoracic Surgery, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna UrbańskaDepartment of General Surgery, Oncology, Metabolic and Thoracic Surgery, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Patryk JesiołowskiDepartment of General Surgery, Oncology, Metabolic and Thoracic Surgery, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Andrzej KwiatkowskiDepartment of General Surgery, Oncology, Metabolic and Thoracic Surgery, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej WalędziakDepartment of General Surgery, Oncology, Metabolic and Thoracic Surgery, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBariatric surgery is a well-established treatment for severe obesity, leading to sustained weight loss, remission of associated medical problems, and improved quality of life (QoL). However, some patients may experience dissatisfaction or regret after surgery. Understanding the relationship between weight loss, QoL, and patient-reported regret is essential for improve care. This study aimed to evaluate decision regret following bariatric surgery and to explore its association with weight loss outcomes and quality of life.

methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted among patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2021 and 2022 at a single institution. Data were collected at baseline and at three-year follow-up via telephone surveys. The Decision Regret Scale and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) were used to assess regret and QoL, respectively. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess associations between regret, weight loss, and QoL.

resultsOf 198 eligible patients, 92 (46.5%) completed the follow-up survey. A high loss to follow-up represents a key limitation of this study, potentially introducing impact on statistical power and generalizability. The majority (88.8%) reported no regret regarding their surgical decision, and 89.9% indicated they would choose to undergo surgery again. All QoL domains showed significant improvement postoperatively (p < 0.05). However, no significant associations were detected between regret scores and weight loss metrics or QoL improvements. The overall decision regret rate was low, with only 1.1% of patients expressing notable regret.

conclusionsMost patients reported low levels of regret following bariatric surgery, with no associations detected between regret and either weight loss outcomes or improvements in quality of life. These findings underscore the importance of comprehensive preoperative counseling and long-term support to address patient expectations and enhance satisfaction after bariatric surgery.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryEmotionsObesity, MorbidPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeWeight LossAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeBariatric surgeryDecision regretPatient-reported outcomesQuality of lifeWeight loss outcomes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.