Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41718897›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2026

Tail-raising and head-turning as predictive behavioural indicators of calving in Murrah buffaloes.

Deepak Chopra, Arun Kumar Misra, T K Mohanty, Rubina K Baithalu, Indu Devi, Chinmayee Sahu, Simran Kamboj, Birender Singh, Pratibha Jareda, Prachi Chandrakar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Deepak ChopraLivestock Production Management Division, ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, NDRI, Karnal, 132001, India.
Arun Kumar MisraLivestock Production Management Division, ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, NDRI, Karnal, 132001, India. mishraak17@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9587-8796
T K MohantyLivestock Production Management Division, ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, NDRI, Karnal, 132001, India.
Rubina K BaithaluLivestock Production Management Division, ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, NDRI, Karnal, 132001, India.
Indu DeviLivestock Production Management Division, ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, NDRI, Karnal, 132001, India.
Chinmayee SahuLivestock Production Management Division, ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, NDRI, Karnal, 132001, India.
Simran KambojAnimal Nutrition Division, ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, NDRI, Karnal, 132001, India.
Birender SinghLivestock Production Management Division, ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, NDRI, Karnal, 132001, India.
Pratibha JaredaLivestock Production Management Division, ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, NDRI, Karnal, 132001, India.
Prachi ChandrakarLivestock Production Management Division, ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, NDRI, Karnal, 132001, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calving prediction is critical for enhancing reproductive management and animal welfare in dairy buffaloes. This study was conducted at the National Dairy Research Institute (NDRI), Karnal, involving detailed behavioural monitoring of 25 Murrah buffaloes from 7 days before to 5 days after calving using continuous CCTV camera surveillance. Day-wise analyses revealed significant behavioural shifts, with tail raising frequency rising sharply from 10.12 (± 0.64) on day − 1 to 24.48 (± 1.13) on the calving day (day 0). Similarly, head turning towards the abdomen increased nearly threefold, from 14.56 (± 0.74) to 45.08 (± 0.99). Six-hour interval data showed a gradual escalation in tail raising from 0.34 movements 120 h pre-calving to 2.57 movements near 6 h pre-calving, while head turning increased from 0.54 to 5.77 movements in the same timeframe. High-resolution hourly monitoring in the last 24 h before calving highlighted an even more pronounced surge in behaviours. Tail raising increased from 0.67 movements at 24 h prior to 8.88 movements at 1 h before calving, and head turning increased from 0.60 to 12.04 movements, a 1906% rise. Using these behavioural indicators, two predictive models—logistic regression and random forest—were developed to identify calving risk within a practical 3-day window. The logistic regression model highlighted tail raising and head turning as significant predictors, achieving an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.78, accuracy of 86%, specificity of 99%, and moderate sensitivity of 42%. The random forest model exhibited similar performance with an AUC of 0.75, 83% accuracy, 94% specificity, and slightly higher sensitivity of 47%. These results demonstrate the potential of behavioural analytics combined with modern predictive modeling to support timely, automated calving detection systems, facilitating improved reproductive outcomes and animal care.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalBuffaloesParturitionReproductionTailAnimalsFemaleHeadPregnancyBehavioural indicatorsCalving predictionHead turning frequencyMurrah buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)Tail raising frequency

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.