ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Tail-raising and head-turning as predictive behavioural indicators of calving in Murrah buffaloes.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calving prediction is critical for enhancing reproductive management and animal welfare in dairy buffaloes. This study was conducted at the National Dairy Research Institute (NDRI), Karnal, involving detailed behavioural monitoring of 25 Murrah buffaloes from 7 days before to 5 days after calving using continuous CCTV camera surveillance. Day-wise analyses revealed significant behavioural shifts, with tail raising frequency rising sharply from 10.12 (± 0.64) on day − 1 to 24.48 (± 1.13) on the calving day (day 0). Similarly, head turning towards the abdomen increased nearly threefold, from 14.56 (± 0.74) to 45.08 (± 0.99). Six-hour interval data showed a gradual escalation in tail raising from 0.34 movements 120 h pre-calving to 2.57 movements near 6 h pre-calving, while head turning increased from 0.54 to 5.77 movements in the same timeframe. High-resolution hourly monitoring in the last 24 h before calving highlighted an even more pronounced surge in behaviours. Tail raising increased from 0.67 movements at 24 h prior to 8.88 movements at 1 h before calving, and head turning increased from 0.60 to 12.04 movements, a 1906% rise. Using these behavioural indicators, two predictive models—logistic regression and random forest—were developed to identify calving risk within a practical 3-day window. The logistic regression model highlighted tail raising and head turning as significant predictors, achieving an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.78, accuracy of 86%, specificity of 99%, and moderate sensitivity of 42%. The random forest model exhibited similar performance with an AUC of 0.75, 83% accuracy, 94% specificity, and slightly higher sensitivity of 47%. These results demonstrate the potential of behavioural analytics combined with modern predictive modeling to support timely, automated calving detection systems, facilitating improved reproductive outcomes and animal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41718897What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.