ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026
How to Ensure a Bright Future for Reproductive Sciences in Animal Conservation.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Ethical Analysis of the Application of Assisted Reproduction Technologies in Biodiversity Conservation and the Case of White Rhinoceros (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Review
- Self-adaptive and efficient propulsion of Ray sperms at different viscosities enabled by heterogeneous dual helixes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Adiposity, reproductive and metabolic health, and activity levels in zoo Asian elephant (The Journal of experimental biology · 2021Article
- Protein biomarkers in serum as a conservation tool to assess reproduction: a case study on brown bears (Conservation physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The chapters in this book emphasize the critical role that reproductive sciences play in wildlife conservation, highlighting the significant progress that has been made since the first edition was published a decade ago. While initially, there was significant excitement around technologies like cloning and bringing animals back from extinction, practical limitations and ethical concerns have since tempered expectations. This new edition underscores that while advanced reproductive technologies can contribute to conservation, they are not standalone solutions for reversing wildlife population declines. Instead, multidisciplinary approaches that integrate environmental science, reproductive biology, and ethical considerations are essential. Key insights from these chapters include how important it is to understand the developmental origins of health and disease in wildlife, especially given how environmental stressors such as pollutants and climate change can affect reproductive success across generations. Papers also discuss the challenges posed by endocrine disruptors and microplastics, which threaten both terrestrial and aquatic species. Advances in noninvasive reproductive monitoring techniques for large marine mammals and birds are highlighted as promising tools for conservation efforts. However, one must be cognizant of ethical concerns central to conservation biology, particularly regarding the use of reproductive technologies in endangered species. The need for minimally invasive methods and more holistic experimental designs is stressed, alongside the importance of balancing scientific innovation with animal welfare. A central theme running through these chapters is the need for enhanced interdisciplinary collaboration, training programs, and public engagement to ensure that wildlife conservation efforts are sustainable and effective in the face of ongoing environmental and anthropogenic challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41718884What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.