ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026
Reproductive Impact of Natural, Synthetic and Emerging Chemicals on Wildlife and Domestic Animals.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wildlife and domesticated animals are exposed to a wide range of natural and synthetic chemicals throughout their life span. Many of these chemicals possess endocrine-disrupting properties which have the potential to disrupt reproductive and developmental process in certain animals. Organochlorine compounds, used as pesticides or in industrial and consumer products in the 1950s, were one of the earliest examples of synthetic endocrine-disrupting chemicals to be linked with adverse reproductive effects in animals. These legacy chemicals have since been restricted for use but continue to persist in the environment and threaten reproductive health of top predators, including porpoises, dolphins and whales. Newer chemicals, including some that were made to replace legacy chemicals and in use today, have been reported to also have endocrine-disrupting properties. These chemicals are manufactured for a wide range of uses, covering a broad range of chemically diverse substances, which include brominated flame retardants, plasticizers and pharmaceutically active ingredients among many other classes of chemicals. When present in the environment, they have been collectively termed emerging contaminants and have been linked with many adverse effects in animals, including impairments in reproduction and development. Whilst exposure to individual chemicals receives regular regulatory interest, there remains a particular concern about wildlife exposures to cocktails of endocrine-disrupting chemicals, which, combined with other stressors, may play a significant role in reproductive disorders that cannot be reproduced in laboratory experiments with single- or multi-chemical exposures. Regulation of chemicals, including restriction on the use of some chemicals, affords some protection to animals of the adverse effects of exposure to some EDCs, but there are presently no specific regulations on a holistic cross-government discharge limit for EDCs into the environment that would significantly reduce or eliminate animal exposure to EDCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41718871What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.