Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41718869›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026

Ethical and Regulation Aspects Relevant to the Study of Reproduction in Wild Species.

Pierfrancesco Biasetti, Barbara de Mori

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pierfrancesco BiasettiLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany. biasetti@izw-berlin.de.
Barbara de MoriDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, Padua University, Padua, Italy. barbara.demori@unipd.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advancements in wildlife reproductive science present both ethical challenges and opportunities for the conservation and management of wild populations. This chapter delves into the ethical dimensions surrounding the applications of wildlife reproductive research and technologies. We emphasize the need for a comprehensive ethical analysis encompassing various dimensions such as social values, animal welfare, research ethics, conservation strategies, and environmental ethics. Advancements in wildlife reproduction science and technology can influence our health and views of society, the health and lives of wild animals, the conservation and management of populations living in the wild or kept as genetic reserves, and, ultimately, our relationship with the environment and our very ideas of nature and naturalness. We analyze and discuss from an ethical standpoint some key issues, including taxa prioritization, boundary problems, animal welfare, gathering and managing samples, technological dependency, respect for naturalness, and compliance with international regulations.

Indexed as

Animals, WildAnimal WelfareConservation of Natural ResourcesReproductionAnimalsHumansReproductive Techniques, AssistedAnimal welfareAssisted reproductive technologiesConservation ethicsReproduction in wild species and ethicsWildlife reproductive technologies

Identifiers

PMID41718869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.