ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Clinical effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in managing refractory upper-extremity pain.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective therapy for intractable pain, but it is used less frequently for upper extremity than for lower limb pain. Evidence supporting SCS for the upper extremity remains limited. This study evaluated the efficacy of SCS for severe refractory upper extremity pain. Thirteen patients with refractory upper extremity pain underwent a trial of SCS. Eleven patients, who achieved marked pain relief during the trial, proceeded to permanent implantation. We collected clinical characteristics and outcomes, including numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) measurements. We then compared pain reduction among subgroups: neural versus non-neural lesions, and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) versus non-CRPS. In the 11 implanted patients, the mean NPRS score decreased from 9.5 of 10 preoperatively to 3.6 of 10 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Analysis showed significant pain improvement in each subgroup (p < 0.05). At last follow-up, the NPRS scores remained below baseline levels in 10 of 11 patients. However, the magnitude of the NPRS score reduction did not differ significantly between neural and non-neural lesions (p = 0.350), or CRPS and non-CRPS (p = 0.245). One participant with CRPS type 2 experienced treatment failure during long-term follow-up. This study demonstrated that SCS effectively alleviates refractory upper extremity pain caused by various etiologies. No single pain etiology, including CRPS, conferred a superior response, suggesting broad potential benefits of SCS in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.