ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Neutrophil differentials in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) and beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) during treatment of respiratory infection: a preliminary study.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory infections are major health concerns in wild and managed cetaceans, yet reliable methods for assessing lower respiratory tract inflammation are limited. We aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) neutrophil differentials in three managed bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) and three managed beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) undergoing treatment for respiratory infections. Infection status was monitored by assessing isolated bacteria and fungi from BALF, BALF neutrophil differentials, and inflammatory markers in the blood, such as total leukocyte counts, plasma fibrinogen levels, and serum iron levels. In animals with respiratory bacterial and/or fungal infections alone, both BALF neutrophil differentials (47.3–55.7%) and blood inflammatory markers were elevated. Following antimicrobial treatment, the differentials decreased (0.8–3.8%), and blood inflammatory markers also returned to normal ranges. Contrastingly, in animals with concurrent conditions, such as respiratory bacterial and/or fungal infections accompanied by wounds on the tail fin or infection-induced iron deficiency anemia, persistent blood inflammatory markers were observed after antimicrobial treatment. Despite this, BALF neutrophil differentials, which are specific to respiratory inflammation, decreased in response to treatment (3.1–21.6%). Moreover, microorganisms isolated from blow samples from these animals were not consistent with those isolated from BALF at the same time. These findings suggest that BALF reflects localized respiratory infection more accurately than the inflammatory markers in the blood, and BALF examination is useful for diagnosing microbial infections in the lower respiratory tract in cetaceans. This approach may improve clinical decision-making and therapeutic outcomes in managed cetacean populations worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.