ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026
Anatomical compatibility of precontoured clavicular locking compression plates: a 3D patient-specific modeling approach with clinical correlation.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrecontoured clavicular locking compression plates (LCP) aim to minimize implant-related complications by providing a close fit to the clavicle's complex morphology. Nevertheless, the inherent anatomical variation observed across patients can lead to discrepancies between implant and bone, potentially contributing to suboptimal fit and an increased risk of complications requiring reoperation.
objectiveThis study analyzed the anatomical compatibility of precontoured clavicular LCPs, detailing their fit characteristics and exploring the correlation between these findings and clinical outcomes.
methodFifty-six 3D, patient-specific clavicular models were reproduced from patients undergoing clavicular fixation (2018-2024). These models were created using 3D printing based on individual 3D-CT reconstructions. Two commercially available clavicular LCP designs were virtually assessed for anatomical compatibility using Computer-Aided Design (CAD) technology. Additionally, a retrospective evaluation of patient outcomes following fracture fixation with the LCPs was conducted. Correlation analysis was used to investigate the relationship between plate compatibility and implant-related complications, as well as reoperation rates.
resultOur findings revealed a significant inverse relationship between plate length and compatibility, with longer plates demonstrating reduced overlap, increased overhang, and lower bicortical screw purchase rates. Clinically, 19.64% of patients required hardware removal due to symptomatic hardware, while 33.93% experienced implant prominence. Importantly, our analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between plate compatibility and both implant-related complications and the need for reoperation.
conclusionThe currently available precontoured clavicular LCPs exhibit suboptimal fit, particularly in the lateral region of the clavicle. These findings highlight the importance of selecting the appropriate plate and improving plate designs to enhance anatomical conformity and potentially reduce the incidence of implant-related complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (Translational Study).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41718820What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.