ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026
Life events and their subjective appraisal by children and adolescents in clinical high-risk states of psychosis: a cross-sectional comparison with inpatients with non-psychotic disorders and community subjects.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While childhood trauma and neglect are generally found to be increased in clinical high-risk of psychosis (CHR-P), findings on life events (LEs) are so far inconclusive, with some indication of a stress sensitization effect in CHR-P, leading to generally higher stress appraisals of LEs, and a LE-reducing effect of negative symptoms. Thus, we studied 50 LEs and their appraisals as assessed with the Munich Life Event Scale in CHR-P patients according to ultra-high risk and basic symptom criteria and age- and sex-matched clinical inpatient (ClinS) and healthy controls (GPS; each n = 112, age 8-17 yrs., 57.1% female). LEs, particularly those of interpersonal nature, were increased in CHR-P compared to GPS but not ClinS, and their number and presence was positively related to subjective negative symptoms. Furthermore, appraisals rarely and only unsystematically differed between groups but correlated significantly in most cases with a more negative appraisal being related to a higher stress appraisal. Thus, there was no indication of a significant stress sensitization effect in CHR-P. Rather, the increased number of LEs, in particular interpersonal ones, likely increases the overall load of stress in terms of a stress accumulation and decreases the size of the supportive social network as well as increases negative symptoms. Thus, early interventions in CHR-P should also include improving strategies to deal with LEs, particularly those of interpersonal nature, to improve resilience and reduce burden of non-normative LEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.