Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41718813›Full record

SynthesisEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026

Understanding silence in adolescence and young adulthood: a mixed methods systematic review on selective mutism.

Rachel de Jong, Anja van der Voort, Wessel Aben, Maretha V de Jonge

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel de JongDepartment of Clinical Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands. r.de.jong@fsw.leidenuniv.nl.
Anja van der VoortDepartment of Clinical Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Wessel AbenYouz Specialist Care for Youth and Families, Den Haag, the Netherlands.
Maretha V de JongeDepartment of Clinical Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics of adolescents and young adults with selective mutism (SM) and their specific (treatment) needs, as well as those of their environment. We conducted a mixed methods systematic review of scientific databases APA PsycINFO and MEDLINE until February 2025. Descriptive studies were included if they incorporated information on individuals between 10-24 years old with a current diagnosis of SM. Two independent reviewers extracted data using combined deductive and inductive coding, with categories finalized by consensus. Data were synthesized using a convergent segregated approach. A total of 749 records were identified, of which 40 studies (n = 54 participants) met inclusion criteria. Methodological quality varied, with 27.5% studies rated as high quality, 65% as moderate, and 7.5% as low. Key findings showed that SM manifests differently in adolescents and young adults compared to children, and therefore requires a different approach to treatment. The reviewed literature shows that adolescents and young adults with SM have a later onset, longer diagnostic delays, and a prolonged history of negative reinforcement of symptoms from accommodations by others. Consequently, SM tends to be more therapy-resistant, requiring greater patience and diligence from therapists.

Indexed as

MutismAdolescentHumansYoung AdultAdolescentsSelective mutismYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID41718813
PMCPMC13272219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.