SynthesisOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Carpal tunnel release with ultrasound guidance : Efficacy and safety].
Synthesis in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOpen carpal tunnel release (OCTR) is effective but results in more extensive scarring. Ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release (USCTR) has become established as a minimally invasive alternative.
aimsThis systematic review aims to compare USCTR techniques, as well as their efficacy and safety, with open techniques. The review covers the technique, functional outcomes (objective and subjective), imaging results, and electrophysiological findings.
resultsUSCTR is safe when certain anatomical conditions are taken into account. Significant improvements in functional outcomes (objective and subjective) are observed. However, no difference in motor latency, sensory nerve conduction velocity, or complication rates has been reported between USCTR and OCTR. USCTR patients return to work 10-15 days earlier and resume their daily activities 21 days earlier than patients who undergo OCTR. The complication and reoperation rates for USCTR are approximately 1.6%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.