Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41718767›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2026

Appearance of the bare area of the proximal radius on magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary assessment on its potential usefulness in preoperative planning for distal biceps brachii tendon repair.

Michal Benes, Petr Fulin, Bruno Jurasek, Vladislav Bartak, David Kachlik, Vojtech Kunc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michal Benes1st Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. benesmichal24@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3326-2325
Petr Fulin1st Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4604-9921
Bruno JurasekCenter for Endoscopic, Surgical and Clinical Anatomy (CESKA), Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-0553-1284
Vladislav Bartak1st Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9071-1943
David KachlikDepartment of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8150-9663
Vojtech Kunc1st Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3165-4977

Funding

Univerzita Karlova v Praze 174523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBare area of the proximal radius (BA) is a variable osseous component within the floor of the supinator canal, caused by a slip between the insertions of the two layers of the supinator muscle. As this variable structure potentially increases the likelihood of iatrogenic injury to the deep branch of the radial nerve (DBRN) during distal biceps brachii tendon repair, this study aimed to assess the appearance of the BA on MRI to evaluate its usefulness in preoperative planning for reinsertion procedures. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 103 elbow MRIs of adult patients were retrospectively included in the study. Each elbow was evaluated in transverse, sagittal, and coronal planes by two observers. Unclear cases were resolved by a consensus among all authors. In case of the presence of the BA, its width was measured, its extent was compared with the level of the radial tuberosity, and its relationship with the DBRN was noted. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was assessed with the use of Cohen's κ coefficient.

resultsThe BA was detected in 49.5% of cases, with a mean width of 4.6 mm. Extent of the BA frequently overlapped with the level of radial tuberosity in 70.6% of cases. The DBRN was in direct contact with the periosteum due to the presence of the BA in 29.4% of cases. No statistically significant differences were found between sides and sexes. Inter- and intraobserver reliability reached almost perfect agreement (all κ > 0.845).

conclusionGiven the frequent presence of the BA, MRI appears to be suitable for preoperative detection of the BA and assessment of its relationship with the DBRN. Preoperative MRI in distal biceps brachii tendon ruptures seems to be beneficial for surgical planning of the fixation device choice and placement.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingRadiusTendon InjuriesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overElbow JointFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative CareRetrospective StudiesBare areaDeep branch of radial nerveDistal biceps brachii tendon injuryMagnetic resonance imagingPosterior interosseous nerveSupinator muscleVariation

Identifiers

PMID41718767
PMCPMC13198491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.