ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Survival and renal outcomes of mucormycosis infection and its treatment regimens in resource-limited settings: a retrospective case series.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mucormycosis is a rapidly progressive opportunistic fungal infection associated with high morbidity and mortality, especially in immunocompromised patients. In resource-limited settings, management is further hindered by delayed diagnosis and restricted access to safer antifungal formulations. To evaluate survival and renal outcomes among patients with mucormycosis treated with different antifungal regimens. A retrospective review was conducted on 19 patients diagnosed with mucormycosis. Clinical features, comorbidities, antifungal therapy, complications, and outcomes were analyzed. Patients were categorized into five treatment groups based on antifungal regimens. Survival and renal outcomes, including acute kidney injury (AKI) and renal recovery, were assessed. Most patients were diabetic (94.7%), and 52.6% had concurrent or recent COVID-19 infection. All had paranasal sinus involvement, with orbital or palatal extension in 68.4% and CNS involvement in 42%. AKI developed in 68.4% of cases, more common with traditional amphotericin regimens (75%) than with liposomal amphotericin (33.3%). Among those with AKI, 38.5% recovered, while 53.8% progressed to chronic kidney disease. Hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 31.6%, mainly with traditional amphotericin. Overall survival was 84.2%, and prolonged antifungal therapy (> 40 days) with early surgical debridement improved outcomes. The study highlights a substantial gap between international guidelines and real-world practice in low-resource environments, where inconsistent access to liposomal amphotericin limits optimal management. Nevertheless, with early diagnosis, aggressive surgical intervention, and vigilant renal monitoring, favorable outcomes are achievable even with traditional amphotericin. Improving national antifungal procurement, strengthening stock management, and subsidizing liposomal formulations could significantly enhance mucormycosis care in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41718746What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.