Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41718703›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Gender differences in submission behavior exacerbate publication disparities in elite journals.

Chaoqun Ni, Isabel Basson, Giovanna Badia, Nathalie Tufenkji, Cassidy R Sugimoto, Vincent Larivière

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chaoqun NiThe Information School, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4130-7602
Isabel BassonÉcole de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6150-3208
Giovanna BadiaOffice of the Dean of Libraries, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1544-2728
Nathalie TufenkjiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1546-3441
Cassidy R SugimotoDepartment of Science and Innovation-National Research Foundation Centre of Excellence in Scientometrics and Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Vincent LarivièreÉcole de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2733-0689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women are particularly underrepresented as leading authors of papers in journals of the highest impact factor, with substantial consequences for their careers. While a large body of research has focused on the outcome and the process of peer review, fewer articles have explicitly focused on gendered submission behavior and the explanations for these differences. In our study of nearly 5000 active authors, we find that women are less likely to report having submitted papers to journals of the highest impact (e.g.,

Indexed as

Periodicals as TopicPublishingAuthorshipFemaleHumansJournal Impact FactorMalePeer Review, ResearchSex FactorsSexismgender gapimpact factormedicinenonepeer reviewscholarly publishing

Identifiers

PMID41718703
PMCPMC12923207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.