Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41718661›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026

Clinician-Led Code-Free Deep Learning for Detecting Papilledema and Pseudopapilledema Using Optic Disc Imaging.

Riddhi Shenoy, Gurtek Singh Samra, Rishi Sekhri, Ha-Jun Yoon, Seema Teli, Ian DeSilva, Zhanhan Tu, Gail DE Maconachie, Mervyn G Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Riddhi ShenoyUlverscroft Eye Unit, School of Psychology and Vision Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Gurtek Singh SamraUlverscroft Eye Unit, School of Psychology and Vision Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Rishi SekhriUlverscroft Eye Unit, School of Psychology and Vision Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Ha-Jun YoonUlverscroft Eye Unit, School of Psychology and Vision Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Seema TeliUlverscroft Eye Unit, School of Psychology and Vision Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Ian DeSilvaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
Zhanhan TuUlverscroft Eye Unit, School of Psychology and Vision Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Gail DE MaconachieUlverscroft Eye Unit, School of Psychology and Vision Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Mervyn G ThomasUlverscroft Eye Unit, School of Psychology and Vision Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Differentiating pseudopapilledema from papilledema is challenging, but critical for prompt diagnosis and to avoid unnecessary invasive procedures. This study evaluates automated machine learning (AutoML) model performance for distinguishing the presence and severity of papilledema using near infrared reflectance images obtained from standard optical coherence tomography, comparing the performance of different AutoML platforms.  . Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using University Hospitals of Leicester, NHS Trust data. Optic nerve head-centered OCT imaging was obtained for 289 patients (813 images) from 2021 to 2024, with normal optic discs (69 patients, 185 images), papilledema (135 patients, 372 images), and optic disc drusen (ODD) (85 patients, 256 images). AutoML platforms-Amazon Rekognition, Medic Mind, and Google Vertex-were evaluated for (1) distinguishing papilledema from normal discs and ODD and (2) grading papilledema severity (mild/moderate vs. severe). Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), precision, recall, F1 score, and confusion matrices for all six models. Results: Amazon Rekognition showed the best performance in distinguishing papilledema from normal/ODD (AUC, 0.90; F1 score, 0.81) and grading severity of papilledema (AUC, 0.90; F1 score, 0.79), outperforming Google Vertex and Medic Mind, which had slightly lower accuracy and higher misclassification rates. Conclusions: This evaluation demonstrates the feasibility of AutoML platforms in papilledema classification using near-infrared reflectance images obtained from standard optical coherence tomography. Further external validation is needed to confirm clinical utility. Translational Relevance: Automated machine learning can be feasibly used to provide an accessible, scalable solution for clinical teams without coding expertise to recognize and characterize papilledema.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEye Diseases, HereditaryOptic DiskOptic Nerve DiseasesPapilledemaTomography, Optical CoherenceAdultDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOptic Disk DrusenRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID41718661
PMCPMC12927425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.