ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Clinician-Led Code-Free Deep Learning for Detecting Papilledema and Pseudopapilledema Using Optic Disc Imaging.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Differentiating pseudopapilledema from papilledema is challenging, but critical for prompt diagnosis and to avoid unnecessary invasive procedures. This study evaluates automated machine learning (AutoML) model performance for distinguishing the presence and severity of papilledema using near infrared reflectance images obtained from standard optical coherence tomography, comparing the performance of different AutoML platforms. . Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using University Hospitals of Leicester, NHS Trust data. Optic nerve head-centered OCT imaging was obtained for 289 patients (813 images) from 2021 to 2024, with normal optic discs (69 patients, 185 images), papilledema (135 patients, 372 images), and optic disc drusen (ODD) (85 patients, 256 images). AutoML platforms-Amazon Rekognition, Medic Mind, and Google Vertex-were evaluated for (1) distinguishing papilledema from normal discs and ODD and (2) grading papilledema severity (mild/moderate vs. severe). Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), precision, recall, F1 score, and confusion matrices for all six models. Results: Amazon Rekognition showed the best performance in distinguishing papilledema from normal/ODD (AUC, 0.90; F1 score, 0.81) and grading severity of papilledema (AUC, 0.90; F1 score, 0.79), outperforming Google Vertex and Medic Mind, which had slightly lower accuracy and higher misclassification rates. Conclusions: This evaluation demonstrates the feasibility of AutoML platforms in papilledema classification using near-infrared reflectance images obtained from standard optical coherence tomography. Further external validation is needed to confirm clinical utility. Translational Relevance: Automated machine learning can be feasibly used to provide an accessible, scalable solution for clinical teams without coding expertise to recognize and characterize papilledema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.